Sailors remained stranded for months due to refusal to unload China’s coal mines

Jag Anand is owned by an Indian company, Great Eastern Shipping. While Great Eastern Shipping hired the crew, it says that it cannot unilaterally let the ship down because the vessel was leased to another company, Cargill, which is based in Minneapolis. In return, he had thrown Jag Anand out of another company.

Jag Anand at the other end of the chain: Chinese company Tangshan is the buyer of Australian coal on Bichi Trading. It purchased goods from Australian supplier Anglo American. When contacted by Great Eastern Shipping and Cargill, the buyer was ultimately responsible for deciding whether Jag Anand could move away from Jingtang port.

“This is local law that requires you to get clearance from the Port Authority to leave, and one of the conditions is that you have to get approval from the receiver,” said Kargil’s marine transportation business chairman Jan Dalman. He said the receiver sold the goods to others, complicating the approval process.

Phone calls to contact Tangshan Baichi Trading went unanswered in two days.

Anastasia is in a similar situation. Officials said it flew the Panamanian flag, but it owned Switzerland’s Mediterranean Shipping, which leased the ship to the Jiangsu steamship. Its intended receiver of coal is E-Commodities Holding, which is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

Each company in the series stated that it only communicated with one or two other parties that dealt directly, and they often stated that they were unclear about the names of others. According to Dean Summers of the Maritime Union of Australia, this is a deliberately complex system.

“Everyone puts the person next to them, and no one takes responsibility,” he said.

A week ago, when China’s state-owned Global Times reported that China’s National Development and Reform Commission approved 10 major power enterprises to import “unrestricted restrictions, other than Australia,” without approval. was. Interpreted as Formalize China’s informal ban. (The Global Times article has since been removed from its website.)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *