Is the play theater or TV streamed? Unions settle a dispute

Two major entertainment industry associations have settled An internal dispute over streaming theaterReaching an agreement that should make it easier for professional theaters around the country to film plays and music for broadcast during the coronovirus epidemic.

The controversy centered on a different epistemic-era question: as cinemas close by the outbreak try to make productions flow, should their contracts fall into the union that represents those working in the theater , Or the one that represents the film and television workers?

Sometimes after a dispute, Actors’ Equity Association, Which represents 51,000 stage actors and state managers, and SAG-AFTRA, Which represents 160,000 people working predominantly in film and television, announced the agreement on Thursday evening.

“It’s a great day,” Kate Shindle, a president, said in an interview on Thursday. “It gives those who have the ability to innovate theater in ways that need them to survive.”

Shindle said he hoped the agreement would lead to more work in theaters for the duration of the epidemic. “We want it to work,” he said.

under which a settlement, Which is tentatively finalized as of December 31, 2021, with both unions agreeing that Equity will cover recorded work for digital distribution, which replaces or complements a live audience.

There are several restrictions – equity-covered work must be distributed to ticketholders or subscribers, and not disseminated to the general public. During the streaming run, viewers must not exceed the seating capacity of the theater, twice that period, or more than three times the capacity of theaters with fewer than 350 seats.

“The program may not include work that is more in the nature of a television show or movie, including work shot in chronological order that is substantially edited before the exhibition, or that includes visual effects. Or other elements that cannot be replicated in a living way, ”the agreement states.

The unions agreed that in times of non-pandemic, meaning that most of the work done for streaming is part of the jurisdiction of SAG-AFTRA.

Union president Gabriel Carteris and David Waite, who are national executive directors, said in a letter to their members, “preserving the historic jurisdiction of SAG-AFTRA when building an important dwelling.” “We are delighted that we are able to help create work opportunities for AEA members when it is needed, while protecting the work opportunities of SAG-AFTRA members now and in the future,” he said. They said.

Disputes between the two unions, which are both part of the AFL-CIO, have surfaced during the epidemic, as theaters increasingly provoked streaming, as government regulations and union security protocols restricted most performances before live audiences .

Both unions argued that they should have the right to represent artists working on streamed plays and music; Theater and commercial producers were caught in the middle, often disappointed that Equity at times seemed like a hindrance to work, but are also aware that Equity objected to theaters working with SAG-AFTRA .

Equity had argued that SAG-AFTRA was reducing it, underpaying its members and making it harder to qualify for health insurance, while SAG-AFTRA argued that filmed entertainment was always its cause. The area has been.

Equity has filed complaints against some theaters over streaming deals already reached with SAG-AFTRA, and those complaints still have to be resolved.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *