I am not a fan of such restrictions.
In 1984, with the help of Arthur ash, I attended Nick Bollettieri Tennis Academy in Bradton, NC. My first roommate was Andre Agassi, then the best 14-year-old player in the world, who hit each ball with a clean heaviness that I had never seen before. Two years later, that fickle teenager made Prof. The rest you know.
But this is tennis, a sport in which players under 14 can begin playing professionally. It is also, of course, a The game is known for its whiteness and wealth. The desire to control opportunities in sports dominated by black athletes, to take advantage of black labor and skills, is a different deal.
It is reasonable to worry about what profound changes the NCAA Games will look like. If we give more freedom to star players, they allow them to earn, and they give labor protection to all athletes. Collegiate powers that predict doom for the entire undertaking. Do not buy it. Doom was also predicted when athletic departments were forced to follow Title IX, ultimately giving equal opportunities to women’s teams.
The actual change is more than justification right now, but it makes sense to move carefully. For all the flaws of the college athletics model, there is an upside to experience that is sometimes overlooked by those who want to hammer on the system.
Playing a sport, which is very important for the fabric of life on most campuses, can promote an athlete not only for a few years, but for decades. I felt that I was picking up powerfully as I moved from tennis to the working world. The combination of call tennis on the résumé and alumni that I saw did not hurt at all.
Years later, whenever I go back to the Berkeley campus, I am still remembered and supported. I talk to the team. Retired professors have come and shared memories of the days when the stands were packed for matches against Stanford and UCLA. Our indoor national championship trophy has been on display for a long time since 1989.