A bill passed by the Democrat-controlled legislature banned almost all government use of facial recognition technology except the motor vehicle registry, which uses it to prevent identity theft. The department can only search for police with search warrants. (Required under a warrant Law of washington state That too takes effect in July.)
But Republican Governor Charlie Baker of Massachusetts threatened to veto the measure.
“I’m not going to sign a bill that bans facial recognition,” Mr. Baker said, according to A local report, Citing its use in solving two cases of homosexuality and child sexual abuse.
Although it was a small part of a major police reform bill, facial recognition guidelines gained attention. NBA player Jaylen Brown and his Celtic teammates presented An opinion article The Boston Globe supported the reduction and deregulation of technology’s racial prejudice problems.
“Despite our positions and profiles as professional athletes, we are not immune to racial profiling and discriminatory policing,” he wrote. “Studies confirm that face recognition is a surveillance technique. Flawed and biased, With high error rates when used against people of color and women. “
He said, “We cannot allow Commonwealth policing techniques of racism in the Commonwealth.”
Eventually the legislator and governor reached an agreement in the form of pending regulations.
Some critics, including other ACLU offices, say that facial recognition is particularly harmful and Should be banned. Police unions and the Boston Police Department did not respond to requests for comment. Ryan Walsh, a public information officer with the Springfield, Mass., Police Department, indicated that the department does not see the measure as the last word on how law enforcement can use this technology.
“While we do not currently use or plan to use any facial recognition software, we hope the law will evolve as technology develops and improves,” he said.