It was a perfect match, and Mr. Trump soon began to respect the freewheeling, stream-to-consciousness style, which became his signature. For years, he used the weighing stage in everything from President Barack Obama’s birth certificate (bogus) to John Stewart’s comedy (overrated) to wind turbines (ugly). Mr. Trump’s filter-free muscle became the gold of engagement for Twitter, which recommended his tweet to millions of new users through his algorithm.
Social media became an even more powerful asset after Mr. Trump entered politics. And after being elected president, thanks to the bulk of his dominance over Twitter and Facebook, he used his accounts in ways that no world leader ever had: to announce major policies, foreign governments Whip up votes in Congress, hire and senior officials, and negotiate with a Motley crew Of racists and whims.
In time, we came to know that the version of President Trump we saw on our feed was, in many ways, more real than the human flesh and blood that occupied the Oval Office. Those who wanted to know what Mr. Trump really thinks about NFL players or speaker Nancy Pelosi did not see him reading the prepared speech or holding a news conference. He saw @realDonaldTrump, the most honest representation of who he was.
The most anticipated result of Mr. Trump’s dismissal from Twitter – and, most likely, he will face a similar ban from Facebook after Inauguration Day – will become a rally cry for conservatives who find themselves victims of Silicon Valley censorship See as
“We’re living in Orwell’s 1984,” the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., took to Twitter (still operational, 6.5 million-followers) on his Twitter account. “Free-speech no longer exists in the US. It died with great technology. “
No serious thinker believes that Twitter and Facebook, as private companies, are obliged to give any platform to any user, just as no one suspects that a restaurant owner boots uncontrolled food to create a scene. Can do. But there are legitimate questions about whether petty untrained technical officers are accountable only to their boards and shareholders (and, in Mr. Zuckerberg’s case), not) Such huge power should be repelled. These actions also raise long-term questions, such as whether the business models of social media companies are fundamentally compatible with a healthy democracy, or whether a generation of Twitter-addicted politicians can never take the lesson that revising retweets being done. Power to govern responsibly.
Mr. Trump’s ban would have a tangible impact on the spread of devolution regarding the 2020 election, much of which Occurred On his accounts. It will also likely accelerate the spread of the American Internet along partisan lines, a process that was already underway, and accelerate calls on the right for repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decision Act, which allows social media companies their As a legal liability. Posts by users.