Harvey Weinstein accused plaintiff agreed to $ 17 million settlement

Ms. Huett, a model, actress and advocate for gender rights, and some other women who voted against the settlement, said they were considering an appeal. He did not want to prevent any survivors from participating in the deal, he said, but also objected to the group of women with rape allegations, and whose cases are within the statute of limitations, with those who have spent years Had experienced this persecution before.

Thomas P., a lawyer involved in the case. Gifra said the victims should have been divided into classes based on the severity of their allegations. Otherwise, “anyone who has been raped has the same vote as the one Harvey Weinstein shouted in his face,” a producer known to men and women regularly.

Mr. Gifra’s client, Alexandra Canosa, in whose suit Weinstein accused her of rape, was in the midst of a nine-hour statement in her case when the bankruptcy court’s decision arrived. A statement for Bob Weinstein was set for Wednesday, but the district judge in the case quashed it, asking that Ms. Canosa make an immediate decision about whether to join the settlement, Mr. Giffra said, with a sharp The change he called “shocking fracking”. For all of us.”

Mr. Guefra stated that, so far, his customers would not participate in the settlement, as the result of this is still unclear. “She does not know what she is getting and she will not know until she has gone through the claim process,” he said. “How can you say that you will accept something before you know what something is?”

Beth Fagen, a lawyer for several women who supported the settlement, said in a statement that Mr. Weinstein “caused irreparable harm with his decades-long, violent sexual abuse.” The fund allows its clients, Lussette Geiss, Sarah Ann Massey and Melissa Thompson, to “apply for meaningful monetary compensation for their injuries in a confidential process”.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *