A year after Megan Markle married Prince Harry in a fairy tale wedding, an extraordinary interview aired Sunday night, her life as a member of the British royal family was so emotionally desolate that she committed suicide. Considered.
At another point, family members told Harry and Meghan, a former United States fraternity actress, that they did not want the couple’s unborn child, Archie, to become a prince or princess, and expressed concern that her complexion How dark it is. The baby will have skin.
A suicidal but self-proclaimed Meghan said of her suicidal thoughts: “I am ashamed to admit this to Harry. I knew that if I didn’t say that, I would. I did not want to be alive right now. “
The 39-year-old Meghan made several anticipated revelations, several times on fire, an interview on CBS with Oprah Winfrey that aired in prime time in the United States. In describing a royal life that began as a fairy tale, but quickly became suffocating and brutal, Meghan’s blunt responses raised combustible issues of race and privilege in the rarest ecological realm of British society.
For an American audience that has endured the intrigue of the palace featured in the popular TV series “The Crown”, it was the equivalent of an explosive bonus episode – a week played by Meghan’s gathering to promote accusations and counter-accusations. About Windsor.
For the royal family, is already busy Hospitalization of its mentor, Prince Philip, It was both an embarrassing air of dirty laundry and a painful reminder, when Harry and Meghan turned away from royal life, The wounds from that breakdown were not yet healed..
Meghan said that while her husband was deeply concerned about her emotional fragility – holding her tightly at public events – she Attempts to seek medical help were resumed By the palace officials, who were concerned about the impact on the monarchy. He described himself as a prisoner at Kensington Palace.
“I couldn’t just call an Uber to the palace,” he said.
Meghan did not say which family members were there Raise questions about the color of her baby’s skin, Nor did he fully explain why the royal family did not automatically plan to give him a royal title that would have provided protection to the child. Once from the convention, Archie would assume the royal title, after his grandfather Prince Charles ascended the throne.
Still, the lack of clarity did not rob the moment of its power: Meghan’s reference to concerns about her child’s skin tone led to a “what?” From Ms. Winfrey.
In other, less provocative revelations, Meghan corrected the record on some family business and revealed the gender of her unborn child.
It was her sister-in-law, Kate, she said, who made her shed tears in a skirmish over dresses for flower girls, rather than reverse, as was widely reported. In another strange encounter with a colleague of her own, she stated that the aide told her that she should not go out to lunch with friends because she was overexposed, even though she left her residence only twice in four months Went.
Harry and Meghan reveal that their second child, due to this summer, Will be a girl.
Meghan, her baby bump, appeared clearly, carelessly and humorously speaking about her early encounters with her future in-laws. She recounted how she described her relationship as always a warm affair before she was introduced to Queen Elizabeth II, and insisted that she had no idea that the royal who worked with her What was expected to happen
“I didn’t do any research on what that would mean,” she said. “I never saw my husband online.”
Harry, who joined Meghan in the second half of the interview, said the pair broke up due to a lack of support or understanding from his family, particularly about the racism he said his wife faced in the news coverage .
“None of my family said anything in those three years,” Harry said.
The prince, who was sixth in line to the throne, was financially cut off by his family after he and Meghan announced plans to step down from royal duties. He Said His relationship with his father was particularly strained – Charles stopped taking his calls at one point – because “hurt a lot.”
It was the most eagerly awaited royal interview since Harry’s mother, on both sides of the Atlantic Princess Diana told the BBC in 1995 That “we were three at this wedding,” referring to her extramarital affair with her husband, Charles, and Camilla Parker Bowles, whom she later married.
Like Meghan, Diana was a glamorous outsider who showered Stardust in the House of Windsor when she married Charles, only to grieve deeply within the confines of royal life. Unlike Meghan, her marriage broke down amid competing claims of infidelity, and by the time she spoke to a BBC journalist, Martin Bashir, He said that the palace sees him as “some kind of danger”.
A vivid book for her turbulent years in the royal family, Diana’s interview was a pop-cultural moment that attracted one of the largest British television audiences in history, parodied on “Saturday Night Live” and the media’s fathom Deepened the hunger to take. All things Diana. Two years later, she was dead in Paris, the victim of a car accident in a high-speed chase with photographers.
Harry called for that tragedy with Ms. Winfrey, saying of his wife’s recurring conflicts with the recurring press, “My biggest concern was history repeating itself.” He blamed longtime journalists for his mother’s death and said that one reason is that the couple moved to California.
And yet, the couple, across low round tables, in comfortable wicker outdoor chairs, perhaps from the country’s most recognizable television host. Ms. Winfrey’s list of celebrity interviews included Michael Jackson, Barack Obama, Kim Kardashian and Donald J. Trump is involved – and he is Known for considering less than the limit (In 1993, she asked a non-accused Mr. Jackson if she was a virgin).
However, Meghan took the interview as an opportunity to reclaim her narrative, after a period when she claims her reputation was distorted A cruel tabloid press fed a diet of lies By jealous palace courtiers.
Even Meghan’s Wardrobe choice Calculated to telegraph the message of a new beginning. His beautiful black dress, designed by Giorgio Armani, featured an attractive lotus flower design, which his staff described as a symbol of revival and a desire to live. She also wore a diamond tennis bracelet that once belonged to Diana.
But the couple’s attempt to rekindle their public image did not go out of the house. In the days leading up to the broadcast, new allegations surfaced that Meghan had Threatened his staff members, Reducing junior personal assistants to tears and driving two personal assistants out of the palace. Meghan dismissed the claims of character assassination, while Buckingham Palace said it would look into them.
Former BBC correspondent, Peter Hunt, said “there is an important struggle going on for control of the narrative”. “What is our settled decision for why Harry and Meghan left the royal family?” Do we accept two hours of Oprah or do we accept those allegations of bullying? “
Early headlines in British tabloids suggested that Meghan’s bombings would resonate for weeks. “I wanted to kill myself,” a headline on the Daily Mail’s website said. “I felt suicidal,” said a headline on Surya’s site.
Meghan has no shortage of defenders. Patrick J. Adams, an actor who worked with him in the television series “Suits”, Described her on twitter Last week as “a deep sense of morality and a fierce work ethic”. The royal family, Mr Adams said, was “obscene” to promote allegations of bullying against him.
Critics have long traced a string of racism to how some people react to Meghan, a professional woman who was divorced before meeting Harry. Initially enthusiastic in their coverage of the couple, Britain’s tabloids turned against them, publishing unrestrained articles about how they flew on a carbon-spiking private jet and limited access to their newborn son.
Some also point to the hypocrisy of Buckingham Palace Investigation of claims of bullying When Prince Andrew is against Meghan, the queen’s second son and Harry’s uncle Refuses to talk to US authorities Regarding allegations of sexual trafficking by his late friend, convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein.
Although the British papers covered every conceivable angle of interview, some made it clear that there were limitations to the interest it was generating. The Sunday Times of London reported that the Queen had no plans to watch the program on her own, which is quite predictable, as it aired after midnight London time. It was to be shown on Britain’s ITV network on Monday evening.
Others in Britain tried to downplay its importance, pointing out that other important things were going on in the country: schools are scheduled to reopen on Monday, and the coronavirus vaccine rollout continues at full speed. At least one prominent British leader said he had no plans to stick to it.
When asked about Harry and Meghan, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Sunday, “Of course, I have all kinds of interest in news around the world.” “I think our time is quite late, so I’ll probably miss it.”